Skip to content
A small meteorological station on a steel mast in a mountain meadow under a big sky.
← All posts

We replaced our estimates with real data — and the numbers went down

Our earlier irradiation figures were 'conservative'. When we replaced them with measured PVGIS data, every single municipality turned out to have been optimistic.

3 min readPublished

Until now the per-municipality yields in our calculator were static regional estimates, typed in by hand and deliberately set on the low side. We replaced them with data from the European Commission's PVGIS database — one query per municipality, at the town's coordinates.

The result was not what we expected. Not one municipality had been too low. Sarajevo fell from 1,200 to 1,154 kWh/kWp, Mostar from 1,380 to 1,350, Banja Luka from 1,170 to 1,140. Srebrenica fell from 1,195 to 1,064 — 131 kWh, over ten per cent.

The lesson isn't that anyone was cheating. It's that a 'conservative estimate' is not a measurement, and that intuition about how sunny somewhere is errs systematically in one direction — upward.

Along with the annual yield we got a monthly distribution for each location. Before, the whole country shared one curve. Now Trebinje produces 5.2% of its annual output in December and Srebrenica 4.1% — a difference anyone budgeting for a winter bill will feel.

The data is generated by a script and committed to the repository, so nothing calls PVGIS at runtime: the estimate has to work when the JRC is down, and a climate normal does not change between two deploys anyway.

Sources

Related

  • How to size your system

    From annual consumption to kilowatts on the roof: what limits the size, how much roof you need, and what each location actually yields.

When the rules change, you'll know

An occasional email: a new open call for subsidies, a change to the net-metering rules, or a change in our model that moves the numbers.

We use the address only for this list. Every email has an unsubscribe link. Privacy policy